Ad Paid links & important information about these products
Ad / advertising disclosure: links marked 'Ad' are paid affiliate links - we earn a commission if you buy an evaluation through them; this can affect which firms are listed, not the terms you receive. What this page is: a factual comparison of published fees and rules, collected from at least two public sources on the date shown and cross-checked; per-field rankings are arithmetic over the tracked set (see Methodology). It is not a recommendation or opinion about whether you should buy any evaluation, and it is not financial advice. What these products are: prop-firm 'challenges' are paid evaluations on simulated accounts; any later 'funded' stage is a contractual profit share from the firm, not an investment return; most participants do not pass; fees are generally non-refundable. The firms listed are not authorised or supervised by the FMA (NZ), ASIC (AU), FCA (UK), CFTC/SEC (US) or any EU regulator, and you have no investor-compensation protection. Operated from New Zealand.
Blue Guardian 1-Step $100K vs Blue Guardian 2-Step $100K
4 of 6 published terms differ between these two offers. Every figure below is read from the firm's own published terms and an independent source, cross-checked, and dated 2026-09-22.
Blue Guardian 1-Step $100K
Ad
Blue Guardian 1-Step $100K — firm's sitePaid link — we may earn a commission. It does not change the terms you receive.
Blue Guardian 2-Step $100K
Ad
Blue Guardian 2-Step $100K — firm's sitePaid link — we may earn a commission. It does not change the terms you receive.
Every published term, side by side
| Term | Blue Guardian 1-Step $100K | Blue Guardian 2-Step $100K | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Profit target (step 1) | 9% | 8% | Blue Guardian 2-Step $100K is lower by 1 percentage points. |
| Profit target (step 2) | — | 4% | Not published by both. |
| Max overall loss | 6% | 8% | Blue Guardian 1-Step $100K is lower by 2 percentage points. |
| Evaluation steps | 1 | 2 | Blue Guardian 1-Step $100K is lower by 1. |
| Account size | $100,000 | $100,000 | Identical. |
| Max daily loss | 4% | 4% | Identical. |
What the differences mean
Does trailing drawdown reset, and does it move after a payout?
A trailing drawdown level moves in one direction only. It follows the account upward as the reference figure it tracks makes new highs, and it stays where it is when the account falls. A losing day does not pull the level back down; the room between the current balance and the level simply shrinks. This is what people mean when they call it a ratchet. The consequence is that a run of gains followed by a return to the starting balance can leave an account close to breach even though it has not lost anything relative to where it began. Full explanation →
What is the difference between a one-step and a two-step evaluation?
An evaluation is a simulated test of whether a participant can reach a stated gain on a demo balance without breaching the loss limits attached to that balance. The structure exists because the firm cannot observe the participant's method directly; it can only observe outcomes against fixed constraints. A phase is therefore a bounded window in which two things are measured at once: whether the profit target is met, and whether the daily and overall drawdown limits stay intact throughout. A phase ends in one of three ways — target reached, limit breached, or, where a time constraint applies, the window closes. Full explanation →
What is a profit target and how is it measured?
A profit target is the gain a simulated account must show before an evaluation phase counts as passed. It is measured against the account's nominal size — the notional balance the simulated account is opened with — and not against the fee paid to enter. The two numbers are unrelated in kind: the fee is an amount actually paid, while the nominal size is a reference figure used to scale the rules. Because the target is expressed as a proportion of that reference figure, the same proportional target represents a different absolute gain on each account size offered, while the underlying trading requirement stays the same in relative terms. Full explanation →
What is the difference between trailing and static drawdown?
Drawdown rules define the loss floor at which an evaluation account is closed. A static maximum loss anchors that floor to the account's opening balance. It is set once and never moves: gains raise the distance between the current balance and the floor, and losses reduce it. A trailing maximum loss anchors the floor to the account's peak instead. As the account rises, the floor rises with it, keeping the permitted loss at a constant distance below the highest point reached. The consequence is that a sequence of gains followed by a partial give-back can breach a trailing limit while the account is still above its starting balance — an outcome that is structurally impossible under a static rule of the same size. Full explanation →
Compare against others
- Blue Guardian 1-Step $100K vs FTMO Challenge 1-Step $100K
- Blue Guardian 2-Step $100K vs FTMO Challenge 1-Step $100K
- Blue Guardian 1-Step $100K vs FTMO Challenge 2-Step $100K
- Blue Guardian 2-Step $100K vs FTMO Challenge 2-Step $100K
- Blue Guardian 1-Step $100K vs FundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100K
- Blue Guardian 2-Step $100K vs FundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100K
- Blue Guardian 1-Step $100K vs FundedNext Stellar 2-Step $100K
- Blue Guardian 2-Step $100K vs FundedNext Stellar 2-Step $100K
- Blue Guardian 1-Step $100K vs The5ers High Stakes 2-Step $100K
- Blue Guardian 2-Step $100K vs The5ers High Stakes 2-Step $100K