Ad Paid links & important information about these products
Ad / advertising disclosure: links marked 'Ad' are paid affiliate links - we earn a commission if you buy an evaluation through them; this can affect which firms are listed, not the terms you receive. What this page is: a factual comparison of published fees and rules, collected from at least two public sources on the date shown and cross-checked; per-field rankings are arithmetic over the tracked set (see Methodology). It is not a recommendation or opinion about whether you should buy any evaluation, and it is not financial advice. What these products are: prop-firm 'challenges' are paid evaluations on simulated accounts; any later 'funded' stage is a contractual profit share from the firm, not an investment return; most participants do not pass; fees are generally non-refundable. The firms listed are not authorised or supervised by the FMA (NZ), ASIC (AU), FCA (UK), CFTC/SEC (US) or any EU regulator, and you have no investor-compensation protection. Operated from New Zealand.
Does trailing drawdown reset, and does it move after a payout?
A trailing drawdown level moves in one direction only. It follows the account upward as the reference figure it tracks makes new highs, and it stays where it is when the account falls. A losing day does not pull the level back down; the room between the current balance and the level simply shrinks. This is what people mean when they call it a ratchet. The consequence is that a run of gains followed by a return to the starting balance can leave an account close to breach even though it has not lost anything relative to where it began.
Many programmes stop the trailing once the level has climbed to the starting balance, or to that balance plus the original distance, depending on how the rule is written. From that point the threshold is fixed and behaves like a static floor. Where no such stopping point exists, the level keeps following every new high for the life of the account, and the effective loss allowance never returns to its opening size. Whether the rule locks, and at what reference point, is the single largest source of variation between otherwise similar offers.
A withdrawal reduces the balance but does not reduce a level that has already ratcheted up. The distance between the two narrows by the amount taken out, so the account has less room afterwards than before. Some programmes offset this by lowering the threshold in step with the withdrawal, or by fixing the level at the moment of the first payout; others do not, and the tightening is permanent.
The measurement basis changes each of these answers. A level tracked against closing balance updates once per session and only registers gains that have been realised by the close, so an open position that runs up and then gives the gain back leaves the threshold untouched. A level tracked against equity continuously registers the peak of the unrealised gain as it happens, raises the threshold to match, and does not lower it when the position retraces — the account can then breach on a trade that closes flat. The same account, the same trades, and two different outcomes, decided by that one line in the rules.
A general explanation of how this works across the offers we track. It is not advice, and it deliberately states no figures — the figures are on the comparison, where they are re-read from source on a schedule and dated.
See how this term is set, offer by offer
Every figure behind these is on the comparison table, read from the firm's own published terms and an independent source and dated. Listed alphabetically, not ranked; links marked "Ad" are paid.
Troy Jackson — Builds and maintains the data pipeline behind this site: selects and verifies each source by hand, and cross-checks every published figure against at least two independent public sources.
Troy built the engine that collects, cross-checks and tracks the figures on this site. Each offer is read from the firm's own published terms and from an independent aggregator, re-checked on a schedule, and dated; where sources disagree on a key figure the page is frozen rather than guessed. Rankings are arithmetic over the tracked set, not opinions. About · Methodology
Data last verified 2026-08-31 from Prop Firm Challenges sources; computed fields are ours.
Get told when the terms change
Firms revise fees, drawdown limits and payout rules often, and usually without announcing it. Every offer here is re-read from source on a schedule — when a published figure moves, you get the change itself, with the date and what it moved from.
One email per change, not a newsletter. Confirm your address first, unsubscribe from any message. See what we have recorded so far.