Ad Paid links & important information about these products
Ad / advertising disclosure: links marked 'Ad' are paid affiliate links - we earn a commission if you buy an evaluation through them; this can affect which firms are listed, not the terms you receive. What this page is: a factual comparison of published fees and rules, collected from at least two public sources on the date shown and cross-checked; per-field rankings are arithmetic over the tracked set (see Methodology). It is not a recommendation or opinion about whether you should buy any evaluation, and it is not financial advice. What these products are: prop-firm 'challenges' are paid evaluations on simulated accounts; any later 'funded' stage is a contractual profit share from the firm, not an investment return; most participants do not pass; fees are generally non-refundable. The firms listed are not authorised or supervised by the FMA (NZ), ASIC (AU), FCA (UK), CFTC/SEC (US) or any EU regulator, and you have no investor-compensation protection. Operated from New Zealand.
FundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100K
| Account size | $100,000 |
|---|---|
| Challenge fee | $569.99 |
| Profit target (step 1) | 10% |
| Max daily loss | 3% |
| Max overall loss | 6% |
| Evaluation steps | 1 |
Ad FundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100K — firm's site (paid link — we may earn a commission)
Here is what the data says about FundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100K: FundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100K (cfd-forex): account size is $100,000, challenge fee is 569.99, fee currency is USD, profit target (step 1) is 10%. Further, max daily loss is 3%, max overall loss is 6%, evaluation steps is 1. From our own computation, captures on record works out to 13; challenge fee trend works out to up; independent sources works out to 1.
- Challenge fee: 2 of 2 tracked at the same account size $100,000, priced in USD (lowest first)
- Profit target (step 1): 4 of 7 tracked at the same account size $100,000 (lowest first)
- Max daily loss: 6 of 7 tracked at the same account size $100,000 (highest first)
- Max overall loss: 6 of 7 tracked at the same account size $100,000 (highest first)
Rankings are arithmetic, per field, over the offers that are comparable with this one on the date shown — the same account size, and for a price the same currency. Comparing a fee across account sizes or currencies would produce a true number about a meaningless set. See methodology. They are not a recommendation.
All tracked variants of this offer
| Account size | Challenge fee | |
|---|---|---|
| $6,000 | 65.99 | |
| $15,000 | 129.99 | |
| $25,000 | 219.99 | |
| $50,000 | 329.99 | |
| $100,000 | 569.99 | shown above |
| $200,000 | 1,099.99 |
Same published rules unless a column shows otherwise; figures collected on the date shown.
Terms used on this page
How often do evaluation terms change, and why does that matter?
Evaluation terms in this category are not fixed reference data; they are commercial settings that firms revise on their own schedule. The variables that move include the entry fee, the loss limits and the method by which they are calculated, the profit split… Full explanation
What is the difference between a one-step and a two-step evaluation?
An evaluation is a simulated test of whether a participant can reach a stated gain on a demo balance without breaching the loss limits attached to that balance. The structure exists because the firm cannot observe the participant's method directly; it can… Full explanation
Where do orders go on an evaluation account?
Orders placed on an evaluation account do not leave the firm's system. They are matched inside a simulated environment against a price feed the firm licenses from a data vendor or aggregates from liquidity providers. Nothing is routed to an exchange, no… Full explanation