Prop Firm Challenges
Ad Paid links & important information about these products

Ad / advertising disclosure: links marked 'Ad' are paid affiliate links - we earn a commission if you buy an evaluation through them; this can affect which firms are listed, not the terms you receive. What this page is: a factual comparison of published fees and rules, collected from at least two public sources on the date shown and cross-checked; per-field rankings are arithmetic over the tracked set (see Methodology). It is not a recommendation or opinion about whether you should buy any evaluation, and it is not financial advice. What these products are: prop-firm 'challenges' are paid evaluations on simulated accounts; any later 'funded' stage is a contractual profit share from the firm, not an investment return; most participants do not pass; fees are generally non-refundable. The firms listed are not authorised or supervised by the FMA (NZ), ASIC (AU), FCA (UK), CFTC/SEC (US) or any EU regulator, and you have no investor-compensation protection. Operated from New Zealand.

How often do evaluation terms change, and why does that matter?

Evaluation terms in this category are not fixed reference data; they are commercial settings that firms revise on their own schedule. The variables that move include the entry fee, the loss limits and the method by which they are calculated, the profit split, the interval and processing conditions for withdrawal requests, minimum activity requirements, consistency rules, and restrictions on holding positions through news events or over weekends. Some revisions are announced. Others appear only as an edited rules page or an updated version of the terms document, with no notice to holders of active accounts. Whether a change reaches an account already in progress depends on the agreement: some documents fix the ruleset in force at the moment of purchase for the life of that account, while others reserve a general right to amend terms applying to all accounts, including live ones.

This is why a comparison is a snapshot rather than a fact. A figure without a capture date carries no information about whether it is current, because the reader cannot tell whether it was recorded before or after the most recent revision. The same undated figure may be accurate, superseded, or never have applied to the account size shown. Discrepancies between a firm's own published terms and a third-party listing are common, and they also occur inside a single firm's own material, where a marketing page and the binding terms document are maintained separately and drift apart.

Three things determine whether a listed figure is usable: the date it was captured, whether the firm's binding terms agree with the summary being read, and what the amendment clause says about accounts already open. The last is the one most often overlooked, since the purchase is frequently assumed to freeze the ruleset.

A history of a firm's terms carries more information than a current reading. It shows how often that firm revises, in which direction, whether revisions have been applied retroactively, and whether fee changes tend to move together with rule changes. Frequency of revision is itself a characteristic of the firm, and it is only visible across successive readings.

A general explanation of how this works across the offers we track. It is not advice, and it deliberately states no figures — the figures are on the comparison, where they are re-read from source on a schedule and dated.

See how this term is set, offer by offer

Every figure behind these is on the comparison table, read from the firm's own published terms and an independent source and dated. Listed alphabetically, not ranked; links marked "Ad" are paid.

Related terms

Troy Jackson — Builds and maintains the data pipeline behind this site: selects and verifies each source by hand, and cross-checks every published figure against at least two independent public sources.

Troy built the engine that collects, cross-checks and tracks the figures on this site. Each offer is read from the firm's own published terms and from an independent aggregator, re-checked on a schedule, and dated; where sources disagree on a key figure the page is frozen rather than guessed. Rankings are arithmetic over the tracked set, not opinions. About · Methodology

Data last verified 2026-08-31 from Prop Firm Challenges sources; computed fields are ours.