Ad Paid links & important information about these products
Ad / advertising disclosure: links marked 'Ad' are paid affiliate links - we earn a commission if you buy an evaluation through them; this can affect which firms are listed, not the terms you receive. What this page is: a factual comparison of published fees and rules, collected from at least two public sources on the date shown and cross-checked; per-field rankings are arithmetic over the tracked set (see Methodology). It is not a recommendation or opinion about whether you should buy any evaluation, and it is not financial advice. What these products are: prop-firm 'challenges' are paid evaluations on simulated accounts; any later 'funded' stage is a contractual profit share from the firm, not an investment return; most participants do not pass; fees are generally non-refundable. The firms listed are not authorised or supervised by the FMA (NZ), ASIC (AU), FCA (UK), CFTC/SEC (US) or any EU regulator, and you have no investor-compensation protection. Operated from New Zealand.
FTMO Challenge 1-Step $100K vs FundedNext Stellar 2-Step $100K
5 of 7 published terms differ between these two offers. Every figure below is read from the firm's own published terms and an independent source, cross-checked, and dated 2026-10-12.
FTMO Challenge 1-Step $100K
Ad
FTMO Challenge 1-Step $100K — firm's sitePaid link — we may earn a commission. It does not change the terms you receive.
FundedNext Stellar 2-Step $100K
Ad
FundedNext Stellar 2-Step $100K — firm's sitePaid link — we may earn a commission. It does not change the terms you receive.
Every published term, side by side
| Term | FTMO Challenge 1-Step $100K | FundedNext Stellar 2-Step $100K | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Challenge fee | — | $549.99 | Not published by both. |
| Profit target (step 1) | 10% | 8% | FundedNext Stellar 2-Step $100K is lower by 2 percentage points. |
| Profit target (step 2) | — | 5% | Not published by both. |
| Max daily loss | 3% | 5% | FTMO Challenge 1-Step $100K is lower by 2 percentage points. |
| Evaluation steps | 1 | 2 | FTMO Challenge 1-Step $100K is lower by 1. |
| Account size | $100,000 | $100,000 | Identical. |
| Max overall loss | 10% | 10% | Identical. |
What the differences mean
How does a daily loss limit work?
A daily loss limit caps how much an account may lose within a single trading day. It is the rule that ends the largest share of evaluations, usually before the overall loss rule is ever approached. The limit is expressed as a share of account size, but what matters more than its size is the reference point it is measured against. Two conventions are common. In the first, the limit is anchored to the balance recorded at the start of the trading day, so intraday gains do not raise the allowance and intraday losses do not lower it until the next day begins. In the second, it is anchored to the highest equity reached during the day, meaning an unrealised profit that is later given back consumes part of the allowance even if the account never falls below where it opened. The same sequence of trades can pass under one convention and breach under the other. Full explanation →
What is the difference between a one-step and a two-step evaluation?
An evaluation is a simulated test of whether a participant can reach a stated gain on a demo balance without breaching the loss limits attached to that balance. The structure exists because the firm cannot observe the participant's method directly; it can only observe outcomes against fixed constraints. A phase is therefore a bounded window in which two things are measured at once: whether the profit target is met, and whether the daily and overall drawdown limits stay intact throughout. A phase ends in one of three ways — target reached, limit breached, or, where a time constraint applies, the window closes. Full explanation →
What is a profit target and how is it measured?
A profit target is the gain a simulated account must show before an evaluation phase counts as passed. It is measured against the account's nominal size — the notional balance the simulated account is opened with — and not against the fee paid to enter. The two numbers are unrelated in kind: the fee is an amount actually paid, while the nominal size is a reference figure used to scale the rules. Because the target is expressed as a proportion of that reference figure, the same proportional target represents a different absolute gain on each account size offered, while the underlying trading requirement stays the same in relative terms. Full explanation →
What is a reset, and what does an evaluation cost after the first payment?
A reset is a payment that restarts an evaluation the participant has already failed, returning the simulated account to its starting balance and clearing accumulated profit, loss and elapsed days. It differs from buying a new evaluation in price and in mechanism: the reset is usually priced below the original entry fee and is applied to the existing account rather than issuing a new one. Terms vary as to whether the reset restores the original rule set or the current published one, and whether any time already elapsed counts toward a minimum trading-day requirement. Full explanation →
Compare against others
- FTMO Challenge 1-Step $100K vs Blue Guardian 1-Step $100K
- FundedNext Stellar 2-Step $100K vs Blue Guardian 1-Step $100K
- FTMO Challenge 1-Step $100K vs Blue Guardian 2-Step $100K
- FundedNext Stellar 2-Step $100K vs Blue Guardian 2-Step $100K
- FTMO Challenge 1-Step $100K vs FTMO Challenge 2-Step $100K
- FundedNext Stellar 2-Step $100K vs FTMO Challenge 2-Step $100K
- FTMO Challenge 1-Step $100K vs FundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100K
- FundedNext Stellar 2-Step $100K vs FundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100K
- FTMO Challenge 1-Step $100K vs The5ers High Stakes 2-Step $100K
- FundedNext Stellar 2-Step $100K vs The5ers High Stakes 2-Step $100K