Prop Firm Challenges
Ad Paid links & important information about these products

Ad / advertising disclosure: links marked 'Ad' are paid affiliate links - we earn a commission if you buy an evaluation through them; this can affect which firms are listed, not the terms you receive. What this page is: a factual comparison of published fees and rules, collected from at least two public sources on the date shown and cross-checked; per-field rankings are arithmetic over the tracked set (see Methodology). It is not a recommendation or opinion about whether you should buy any evaluation, and it is not financial advice. What these products are: prop-firm 'challenges' are paid evaluations on simulated accounts; any later 'funded' stage is a contractual profit share from the firm, not an investment return; most participants do not pass; fees are generally non-refundable. The firms listed are not authorised or supervised by the FMA (NZ), ASIC (AU), FCA (UK), CFTC/SEC (US) or any EU regulator, and you have no investor-compensation protection. Operated from New Zealand.

FTMO Challenge 1-Step $100K vs FundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100K

2 of 6 published terms differ between these two offers. Every figure below is read from the firm's own published terms and an independent source, cross-checked, and dated 2026-10-12.

FTMO Challenge 1-Step $100K

Full terms, capture history and rankings →

Ad
FTMO Challenge 1-Step $100K — firm's sitePaid link — we may earn a commission. It does not change the terms you receive.

FundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100K

Full terms, capture history and rankings →

Ad
FundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100K — firm's sitePaid link — we may earn a commission. It does not change the terms you receive.

Every published term, side by side

TermFTMO Challenge 1-Step $100KFundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100KDifference
Challenge fee—$569.99Not published by both.
Max overall loss10%6%FundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100K is lower by 4 percentage points.
Account size$100,000$100,000Identical.
Profit target (step 1)10%10%Identical.
Max daily loss3%3%Identical.
Evaluation steps11Identical.

Differences are arithmetic over the two figures shown, in the field's own units. There is no overall score on this page and nothing here is a recommendation: which of these differences matters depends entirely on how someone trades. How these figures are collected →

What the differences mean

Does trailing drawdown reset, and does it move after a payout?

A trailing drawdown level moves in one direction only. It follows the account upward as the reference figure it tracks makes new highs, and it stays where it is when the account falls. A losing day does not pull the level back down; the room between the current balance and the level simply shrinks. This is what people mean when they call it a ratchet. The consequence is that a run of gains followed by a return to the starting balance can leave an account close to breach even though it has not lost anything relative to where it began. Full explanation →

What is a reset, and what does an evaluation cost after the first payment?

A reset is a payment that restarts an evaluation the participant has already failed, returning the simulated account to its starting balance and clearing accumulated profit, loss and elapsed days. It differs from buying a new evaluation in price and in mechanism: the reset is usually priced below the original entry fee and is applied to the existing account rather than issuing a new one. Terms vary as to whether the reset restores the original rule set or the current published one, and whether any time already elapsed counts toward a minimum trading-day requirement. Full explanation →

What is the difference between trailing and static drawdown?

Drawdown rules define the loss floor at which an evaluation account is closed. A static maximum loss anchors that floor to the account's opening balance. It is set once and never moves: gains raise the distance between the current balance and the floor, and losses reduce it. A trailing maximum loss anchors the floor to the account's peak instead. As the account rises, the floor rises with it, keeping the permitted loss at a constant distance below the highest point reached. The consequence is that a sequence of gains followed by a partial give-back can breach a trailing limit while the account is still above its starting balance — an outcome that is structurally impossible under a static rule of the same size. Full explanation →

What does the evaluation fee cover, and is it refundable?

The evaluation fee is the price of entry to an assessment. It is not a deposit, not margin, and not an amount exposed to market movement. Nothing in the fee is placed into a trading position; the simulated account is credited with a notional starting balance that exists only inside the firm's platform. Because the money never enters a market, it cannot be lost through trading and cannot be withdrawn through trading either. It is paid to the firm and becomes the firm's revenue at the moment of purchase. Full explanation →

Compare against others