FundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100K vs The5ers High Stakes 2-Step $100K

8 of 12 published terms differ between these two offers. Every figure below is read from the firm's own published terms and an independent source, cross-checked, and dated 2026-08-31.

FundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100K

Full terms, capture history and rankings →

Ad
FundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100K — firm's sitePaid link — we may earn a commission. It does not change the terms you receive.

The5ers High Stakes 2-Step $100K

Full terms, capture history and rankings →

Ad
The5ers High Stakes 2-Step $100K — firm's sitePaid link — we may earn a commission. It does not change the terms you receive.

Every published term, side by side

TermFundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100KThe5ers High Stakes 2-Step $100KDifference
Challenge fee549.99545The5ers High Stakes 2-Step $100K is lower by 4.99.
Profit target (step 2)5%Not published by both.
Max daily loss3%5%FundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100K is lower by 2 percentage points.
Max overall loss6%10%FundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100K is lower by 4 percentage points.
Minimum trading days3Not published by both.
Max leverage30100FundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100K is lower by 70.
Payout cycleWeeklyBi-WeeklyDiffers.
Evaluation steps12FundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100K is lower by 1.
Account size$100,000$100,000Identical.
Fee currencyUSDUSDIdentical.
Profit target (step 1)10%10%Identical.
Profit split (funded)80%80%Identical.

Differences are arithmetic over the two figures shown, in the field's own units. There is no overall score on this page and nothing here is a recommendation: which of these differences matters depends entirely on how someone trades. How these figures are collected →

What the differences mean

How does a daily loss limit work?

A daily loss limit caps how much an account may lose within a single trading day. It is the rule that ends the largest share of evaluations, usually before the overall loss rule is ever approached. The limit is expressed as a share of account size, but what matters more than its size is the reference point it is measured against. Two conventions are common. In the first, the limit is anchored to the balance recorded at the start of the trading day, so intraday gains do not raise the allowance and intraday losses do not lower it until the next day begins. In the second, it is anchored to the highest equity reached during the day, meaning an unrealised profit that is later given back consumes part of the allowance even if the account never falls below where it opened. The same sequence of trades can pass under one convention and breach under the other. Full explanation →

Does trailing drawdown reset, and does it move after a payout?

A trailing drawdown level moves in one direction only. It follows the account upward as the reference figure it tracks makes new highs, and it stays where it is when the account falls. A losing day does not pull the level back down; the room between the current balance and the level simply shrinks. This is what people mean when they call it a ratchet. The consequence is that a run of gains followed by a return to the starting balance can leave an account close to breach even though it has not lost anything relative to where it began. Full explanation →

What does the leverage figure mean on an evaluation account?

Leverage on an evaluation account expresses the maximum notional position size a trader may hold relative to the account's nominal balance. It is a ratio: for every unit of stated balance, the platform permits a position of some multiple of that unit. It functions as a ceiling imposed by the account settings, not an instruction or a default trade size. A trader operating far below the ceiling is unaffected by where the ceiling sits; the figure only becomes binding at the point an order would exceed it, at which stage the platform rejects or truncates the order. Full explanation →

Why do evaluations require a minimum number of trading days?

A minimum trading day requirement sets a floor on the number of separate sessions in which activity must occur before an evaluation can be marked as passed. It exists because a profit target can, in principle, be reached by one oversized position held through one favourable move. That outcome tells the firm nothing about how a trader sizes, exits or repeats decisions. By forcing activity to be spread across distinct sessions, the condition converts the test from a single event into a sequence, which is what the firm claims to be measuring. Full explanation →

Compare against others