FTMO Challenge 2-Step $100K vs The5ers High Stakes 2-Step $100K

5 of 12 published terms differ between these two offers. Every figure below is read from the firm's own published terms and an independent source, cross-checked, and dated 2026-08-31.

FTMO Challenge 2-Step $100K

Full terms, capture history and rankings →

Ad
FTMO Challenge 2-Step $100K — firm's sitePaid link — we may earn a commission. It does not change the terms you receive.

The5ers High Stakes 2-Step $100K

Full terms, capture history and rankings →

Ad
The5ers High Stakes 2-Step $100K — firm's sitePaid link — we may earn a commission. It does not change the terms you receive.

Every published term, side by side

TermFTMO Challenge 2-Step $100KThe5ers High Stakes 2-Step $100KDifference
Challenge fee439545FTMO Challenge 2-Step $100K is lower by 106.
Fee currencyEURUSDDiffers.
Minimum trading days43The5ers High Stakes 2-Step $100K is lower by 1.
Profit split (funded)90%80%The5ers High Stakes 2-Step $100K is lower by 10 percentage points.
Payout cycleBy WeeklyBi-WeeklyDiffers.
Account size$100,000$100,000Identical.
Profit target (step 1)10%10%Identical.
Profit target (step 2)5%5%Identical.
Max daily loss5%5%Identical.
Max overall loss10%10%Identical.
Max leverage100100Identical.
Evaluation steps22Identical.

Differences are arithmetic over the two figures shown, in the field's own units. There is no overall score on this page and nothing here is a recommendation: which of these differences matters depends entirely on how someone trades. How these figures are collected →

What the differences mean

Why do evaluations require a minimum number of trading days?

A minimum trading day requirement sets a floor on the number of separate sessions in which activity must occur before an evaluation can be marked as passed. It exists because a profit target can, in principle, be reached by one oversized position held through one favourable move. That outcome tells the firm nothing about how a trader sizes, exits or repeats decisions. By forcing activity to be spread across distinct sessions, the condition converts the test from a single event into a sequence, which is what the firm claims to be measuring. Full explanation →

What is a payout cycle?

A payout cycle is the interval that must elapse between the points at which a participant on a simulated funded account may request payment of their agreed share of the account's recorded gains. It is a structural term, not an administrative detail: two offers with identical profit splits can differ substantially in how frequently that split is actually accessible, and the cycle length interacts with every other rule, because a longer interval means more trading days during which a breach can end the account before any request becomes possible. Full explanation →

What does the profit split mean?

The profit split is the proportion of simulated gains recorded on a funded-stage account that the participant may request as a payment under the contract. The remainder stays with the firm. It is expressed as a share of the profit measured above a reference point — usually the highest balance already paid out from, or the starting balance of the stage — so gains that merely recover an earlier drawdown generally do not count toward a new request. The split applies only to the simulated performance the account is credited with; it is not a share of any external trading result and does not describe capital held by the participant. Full explanation →

What is a reset, and what does an evaluation cost after the first payment?

A reset is a payment that restarts an evaluation the participant has already failed, returning the simulated account to its starting balance and clearing accumulated profit, loss and elapsed days. It differs from buying a new evaluation in price and in mechanism: the reset is usually priced below the original entry fee and is applied to the existing account rather than issuing a new one. Terms vary as to whether the reset restores the original rule set or the current published one, and whether any time already elapsed counts toward a minimum trading-day requirement. Full explanation →

Compare against others