Ad Paid links & important information about these products
Ad / advertising disclosure: links marked 'Ad' are paid affiliate links - we earn a commission if you buy an evaluation through them; this can affect which firms are listed, not the terms you receive. What this page is: a factual comparison of published fees and rules, collected from at least two public sources on the date shown and cross-checked; per-field rankings are arithmetic over the tracked set (see Methodology). It is not a recommendation or opinion about whether you should buy any evaluation, and it is not financial advice. What these products are: prop-firm 'challenges' are paid evaluations on simulated accounts; any later 'funded' stage is a contractual profit share from the firm, not an investment return; most participants do not pass; fees are generally non-refundable. The firms listed are not authorised or supervised by the FMA (NZ), ASIC (AU), FCA (UK), CFTC/SEC (US) or any EU regulator, and you have no investor-compensation protection. Operated from New Zealand.
FTMO Challenge 2-Step $100K vs FundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100K
6 of 8 published terms differ between these two offers. Every figure below is read from the firm's own published terms and an independent source, cross-checked, and dated 2026-10-12.
FTMO Challenge 2-Step $100K
Ad
FTMO Challenge 2-Step $100K — firm's sitePaid link — we may earn a commission. It does not change the terms you receive.
FundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100K
Ad
FundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100K — firm's sitePaid link — we may earn a commission. It does not change the terms you receive.
Every published term, side by side
| Term | FTMO Challenge 2-Step $100K | FundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100K | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Challenge fee | — | $569.99 | Not published by both. |
| Profit target (step 2) | 5% | — | Not published by both. |
| Max daily loss | 5% | 3% | FundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100K is lower by 2 percentage points. |
| Max overall loss | 10% | 6% | FundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100K is lower by 4 percentage points. |
| Minimum trading days | 4 | — | Not published by both. |
| Evaluation steps | 2 | 1 | FundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100K is lower by 1. |
| Account size | $100,000 | $100,000 | Identical. |
| Profit target (step 1) | 10% | 10% | Identical. |
What the differences mean
How does a daily loss limit work?
A daily loss limit caps how much an account may lose within a single trading day. It is the rule that ends the largest share of evaluations, usually before the overall loss rule is ever approached. The limit is expressed as a share of account size, but what matters more than its size is the reference point it is measured against. Two conventions are common. In the first, the limit is anchored to the balance recorded at the start of the trading day, so intraday gains do not raise the allowance and intraday losses do not lower it until the next day begins. In the second, it is anchored to the highest equity reached during the day, meaning an unrealised profit that is later given back consumes part of the allowance even if the account never falls below where it opened. The same sequence of trades can pass under one convention and breach under the other. Full explanation →
Does trailing drawdown reset, and does it move after a payout?
A trailing drawdown level moves in one direction only. It follows the account upward as the reference figure it tracks makes new highs, and it stays where it is when the account falls. A losing day does not pull the level back down; the room between the current balance and the level simply shrinks. This is what people mean when they call it a ratchet. The consequence is that a run of gains followed by a return to the starting balance can leave an account close to breach even though it has not lost anything relative to where it began. Full explanation →
Why do evaluations require a minimum number of trading days?
A minimum trading day requirement sets a floor on the number of separate sessions in which activity must occur before an evaluation can be marked as passed. It exists because a profit target can, in principle, be reached by one oversized position held through one favourable move. That outcome tells the firm nothing about how a trader sizes, exits or repeats decisions. By forcing activity to be spread across distinct sessions, the condition converts the test from a single event into a sequence, which is what the firm claims to be measuring. Full explanation →
What is the difference between a one-step and a two-step evaluation?
An evaluation is a simulated test of whether a participant can reach a stated gain on a demo balance without breaching the loss limits attached to that balance. The structure exists because the firm cannot observe the participant's method directly; it can only observe outcomes against fixed constraints. A phase is therefore a bounded window in which two things are measured at once: whether the profit target is met, and whether the daily and overall drawdown limits stay intact throughout. A phase ends in one of three ways — target reached, limit breached, or, where a time constraint applies, the window closes. Full explanation →
Compare against others
- FTMO Challenge 2-Step $100K vs Blue Guardian 1-Step $100K
- FundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100K vs Blue Guardian 1-Step $100K
- FTMO Challenge 2-Step $100K vs Blue Guardian 2-Step $100K
- FundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100K vs Blue Guardian 2-Step $100K
- FTMO Challenge 2-Step $100K vs FTMO Challenge 1-Step $100K
- FundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100K vs FTMO Challenge 1-Step $100K
- FTMO Challenge 2-Step $100K vs FundedNext Stellar 2-Step $100K
- FundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100K vs FundedNext Stellar 2-Step $100K
- FTMO Challenge 2-Step $100K vs The5ers High Stakes 2-Step $100K
- FundedNext Stellar 1-Step $100K vs The5ers High Stakes 2-Step $100K