FundedNext Stellar 2-Step $100K vs The5ers High Stakes 2-Step $100K

4 of 12 published terms differ between these two offers. Every figure below is read from the firm's own published terms and an independent source, cross-checked, and dated 2026-08-31.

FundedNext Stellar 2-Step $100K

Full terms, capture history and rankings →

Ad
FundedNext Stellar 2-Step $100K — firm's sitePaid link — we may earn a commission. It does not change the terms you receive.

The5ers High Stakes 2-Step $100K

Full terms, capture history and rankings →

Ad
The5ers High Stakes 2-Step $100K — firm's sitePaid link — we may earn a commission. It does not change the terms you receive.

Every published term, side by side

TermFundedNext Stellar 2-Step $100KThe5ers High Stakes 2-Step $100KDifference
Challenge fee529.99545FundedNext Stellar 2-Step $100K is lower by 15.01.
Profit target (step 1)8%10%FundedNext Stellar 2-Step $100K is lower by 2 percentage points.
Minimum trading days3Not published by both.
Payout cycleWeeklyBi-WeeklyDiffers.
Account size$100,000$100,000Identical.
Fee currencyUSDUSDIdentical.
Profit target (step 2)5%5%Identical.
Max daily loss5%5%Identical.
Max overall loss10%10%Identical.
Profit split (funded)80%80%Identical.
Max leverage100100Identical.
Evaluation steps22Identical.

Differences are arithmetic over the two figures shown, in the field's own units. There is no overall score on this page and nothing here is a recommendation: which of these differences matters depends entirely on how someone trades. How these figures are collected →

What the differences mean

Why do evaluations require a minimum number of trading days?

A minimum trading day requirement sets a floor on the number of separate sessions in which activity must occur before an evaluation can be marked as passed. It exists because a profit target can, in principle, be reached by one oversized position held through one favourable move. That outcome tells the firm nothing about how a trader sizes, exits or repeats decisions. By forcing activity to be spread across distinct sessions, the condition converts the test from a single event into a sequence, which is what the firm claims to be measuring. Full explanation →

What is a payout cycle?

A payout cycle is the interval that must elapse between the points at which a participant on a simulated funded account may request payment of their agreed share of the account's recorded gains. It is a structural term, not an administrative detail: two offers with identical profit splits can differ substantially in how frequently that split is actually accessible, and the cycle length interacts with every other rule, because a longer interval means more trading days during which a breach can end the account before any request becomes possible. Full explanation →

What is a profit target and how is it measured?

A profit target is the gain a simulated account must show before an evaluation phase counts as passed. It is measured against the account's nominal size — the notional balance the simulated account is opened with — and not against the fee paid to enter. The two numbers are unrelated in kind: the fee is an amount actually paid, while the nominal size is a reference figure used to scale the rules. Because the target is expressed as a proportion of that reference figure, the same proportional target represents a different absolute gain on each account size offered, while the underlying trading requirement stays the same in relative terms. Full explanation →

What is a reset, and what does an evaluation cost after the first payment?

A reset is a payment that restarts an evaluation the participant has already failed, returning the simulated account to its starting balance and clearing accumulated profit, loss and elapsed days. It differs from buying a new evaluation in price and in mechanism: the reset is usually priced below the original entry fee and is applied to the existing account rather than issuing a new one. Terms vary as to whether the reset restores the original rule set or the current published one, and whether any time already elapsed counts toward a minimum trading-day requirement. Full explanation →

Compare against others